http://webel.net/archives/575 The blog and website of Lance Webel. Sat, 22 Nov 2008 03:07:14 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1 http://webel.net/archives/575#comment-1618 Wicker Wed, 27 Sep 2006 20:47:16 +0000 http://webel.net/archives/575#comment-1618 Awesome Awesome

]]> http://webel.net/archives/575#comment-1614 angie Wed, 27 Sep 2006 20:06:21 +0000 http://webel.net/archives/575#comment-1614 ha!! thats hilarious! ha!! thats hilarious!

]]> http://webel.net/archives/575#comment-1610 Lance Wed, 27 Sep 2006 17:09:21 +0000 http://webel.net/archives/575#comment-1610 Ha! I've always loved how in the movies and on TV they can take a blurred or pixelated image and somehow "optimize" it. Even with dithering and smoothing, it just doesn't work that way! Ha! I’ve always loved how in the movies and on TV they can take a blurred or pixelated image and somehow “optimize” it. Even with dithering and smoothing, it just doesn’t work that way!

]]> http://webel.net/archives/575#comment-1607 Julie D Wed, 27 Sep 2006 13:18:34 +0000 http://webel.net/archives/575#comment-1607 You know, if you were a CSI, you could isolate the reflection on his/her eye and get an unrealistically clear image of who he/she is sitting with, thus solving the case! You know, if you were a CSI, you could isolate the reflection on his/her eye and get an unrealistically clear image of who he/she is sitting with, thus solving the case!

]]>